Rodent and fly models in behavioral neuroscience: An evaluation of methodological advances, comparative research, and future perspectives

The assessment of behavioral outcomes is a central component of neuroscientific research, which has required continuous technological innovations to produce more detailed and reliable findings. In this article, we provide an in-depth review on the progress and future implications for three model organisms (mouse, rat, and Drosophila) essential to our current understanding of behavior. By compiling a comprehensive catalog of popular assays, we are able to compare the diversity of tasks and usage of these animal models in behavioral research. This compilation also allows for the evaluation of existing state-of-the-art methods and experimental applications, including optogenetics, machine learning, and high-throughput behavioral assays. We go on to discuss novel apparatuses and inter-species analyses for centrophobism, feeding behavior, aggression and mating paradigms, with the goal of providing a unique view on comparative behavioral research. The challenges and recent advances are evaluated in terms of their translational value, ethical procedures, and trustworthiness for behavioral research.

Keywords: 3Rs; Aggression; Animal ethics; Animal models; Anxiety; Artificial intelligence; Behavioral tests; Centrophobism; Closed-loop feedback optogenetics; Feeding; Mating; Reproducibility; Translational research.

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Similar articles

Lambert K, Kent M, Vavra D. Lambert K, et al. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Sep;104:191-196. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.034. Epub 2019 Jul 3. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019. PMID: 31278952

Arakawa H, Iguchi Y. Arakawa H, et al. Neurosci Res. 2018 Oct;135:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 9. Neurosci Res. 2018. PMID: 29432797 Review.

Parmigiani S, Palanza P, Rogers J, Ferrari PF. Parmigiani S, et al. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999 Nov;23(7):957-69. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(99)00029-9. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999. PMID: 10580310 Review.

van Dam EA, Noldus LPJJ, van Gerven MAJ. van Dam EA, et al. J Neurosci Methods. 2020 Feb 15;332:108536. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108536. Epub 2019 Nov 30. J Neurosci Methods. 2020. PMID: 31794777

Blanchard RJ, Wall PM, Blanchard DC. Blanchard RJ, et al. Horm Behav. 2003 Sep;44(3):161-70. doi: 10.1016/s0018-506x(03)00127-2. Horm Behav. 2003. PMID: 14609538 Review.

Cited by

Johnston KG, Grieco SF, Nie Q, Theis FJ, Xu X. Johnston KG, et al. Nat Methods. 2024 Aug 22. doi: 10.1038/s41592-024-02390-8. Online ahead of print. Nat Methods. 2024. PMID: 39174710 Review.

Maxwell DL, Orian JM. Maxwell DL, et al. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2023 Nov 6;15:11795735231211508. doi: 10.1177/11795735231211508. eCollection 2023. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2023. PMID: 37942276 Free PMC article. Review.

Zhang YJ, Luo Z, Sun Y, Liu J, Chen Z. Zhang YJ, et al. Zool Res. 2023 Nov 18;44(6):1115-1131. doi: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2023.263. Zool Res. 2023. PMID: 37933101 Free PMC article. Review.

Holvoet H, Long DM, Yang L, Choi J, Marney L, Poeck B, Maier CS, Soumyanath A, Kretzschmar D, Strauss R. Holvoet H, et al. Nutrients. 2023 Sep 16;15(18):4016. doi: 10.3390/nu15184016. Nutrients. 2023. PMID: 37764799 Free PMC article.

Korczyńska J, Szczuka A, Urzykowska J, Kochanowski M, Andrzejczyk NG, Piwowarek KJ, Godzińska EJ. Korczyńska J, et al. Animals (Basel). 2023 Aug 28;13(17):2734. doi: 10.3390/ani13172734. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37684998 Free PMC article.